Surveillance: A Most Unreasonable Search and Seizure
Shut Down Overview 3rd & 6th July 2002
Home | Documentary: The Weather Underground | Human Being Used As Surveillance Device | Michigan Passes Anti Electronic Harassment Law Including Life in Prison | Surveillance & Dr David Kelly's Death | Human Rights Destroyed By Military Justice and Extradition | Fabricated Intelligence | Cataract Surgery 9th June 2003 Resulting From 58 Months of Surveillance Technology | Abuse of Power for 36 Million | A Truly Unreasonable Search and Seizure | Shut Down Overview 3rd & 6th July 2002 | Shut Down Effort 27/28th July 2002 | Shut Down Effort 9/11th August 2002 | J'accuse: Crimes Against Humanity | US National Security Breach: Email to DIRNSA | Attempted Murder By Poisoning And Camp X-Ray | Direct Interference With Medical Care | Surveillance Overview and Table of Contents | Letter to the Prime Minister | Correspondence to My Member of Parliament - Abuse of Power I | Correspondence to My Member of Parliament - Abuse of Power II | Crime and Corruption: Tenant Management I | Crime and Corruption: Tenant Management II | Crime and Corruption: Tenant Management III | Child Abuse Reporting and Harassment | Personal Injuries | Sleep Deprivation Logs | Human Rights Act of 1998 | Protection from Harassment Act 1997 | Links | Search Links
Surveillance Management Out of Control
(Last Revised Monday, 9th December 2002)

US Government Agents Run Amok in London, England

I - Out of Control Management of Surveillance Activity
Wednesday, 3rd July 2002

Wednesday, 3rd July 2002

Mesdames et Messrs [See Distribution At End]

Total Effort to Shut Down: Part I: Out of Control Management of Surveillance Activity

I intend to send along four Emails under this title "Total Effort to Shut Down" with the following four parts:

I. Out of Control Management of Surveillance Activity
II. Fabricating Mental Illness While Exploiting the Mental Ill
III. Surreptitious Medication Without Consent or Knowledge
IV. Abuse of Environmental Health and Emergency Services

Following my Email at midday on Monday, 1st July 2002, there was a distinct improvement in the desktop computer utilisation after a conversation between the US Government Agent "Harry" the ex-US Marine now Trainee and a male who apparently had been watching from a vehicle parked on *********** Road under my kitchen window at the end of the building. This male was heard to say ". . . not in England" amid ongoing and continuous apparent protests from "Harry" citing his already noted false allegations as apparent justification for his criminal behaviour. That evening the system worked normally for the first time in months with fast speeds reflecting the upgrade to 128 Mb RAM and added hard disk space. In fact, the web cam worked for an hour and 45 minutes which was the longest time it has functioned at one time in months as well.

This was not to be continued. The apparent interference returned during the night as I tried to sleep being woken several times, kept awake and driven out of bed once again by false allegations of the grossest, obscene kind reflecting total invasion of privacy while I slept or tried to. The desktop system crashed on access first thing in the morning yesterday. This continued all day yesterday until last evening when the same freedom and speed of usage returned.

Again, this morning there were numerous problems which had occurred due to surveillance software interference during the night. Without this interference which was revealed by the kinds of errors present this morning, e.g., lack of memory due to system memory degradation, the desktop computer should have picked up with usage and continued as I left it the night before. Instead, after correcting several problems, there was not enough memory to reload a programme that had crashed in the night, and the desktop computer system had to be rebooted.

This reflects the fact that the surveillance operation is out of control. Apparently when one person is present who says "No" and ". . . not in England" the direct and indirect interference is stopped with the system working splendidly as it should fully utilising all the upgraded resources which were installed over several months at the end of last year as limited finances permitted. These were installed in specific response to the inability to use the desktop computer at all due to the interference from the surveillance software.

It is my belief that the surveillance software is rubbish ("buggy", i.e., full of "bugs") causing many faults while this desktop system and notebook system are being used as research and development systems. Thus, many crashes and denial of service activity comes indirectly just from just its usage. There has been numerous comments from a guy who sits in the road responding on occasion to things which cannot be done or he cannot work with and must be blocked, e.g., Caller ID on the telephone line if installed in the desktop system. This comment occurred originally several months ago with the installation of the telephone and more recently when I was accessing a web site for that information. Caller ID does work now separate from the computer, but when I went to access a web site for a Caller ID analyser, this was blocked after it was noted.

There has been a deliberate effort block my access to web sites and software which were needed for proper and secure operation of the desktop computer system. The following web sites have been denied to me:

1. Microsoft (used for upgrades of recent critical updates)
2. Tripod Lycos Site Builder (management access to my web site)
3. Bravenet (various facilities used on my web site)
4. SETI (the software to process the radio signals from space)
5. Columbia University (this always worked now it does not)
6. Hotmail (denied access but several others work)

There was an entire series of arguments which went on about access to 128 bit encryption which was needed to access financial account information. "Harry" did everything he could to deny access to various sources for installing this level of encryption by stating "You don't want him to have 128 bit encryption." Nothing I do is encrypted although I have PGP but have never used it. This is necessary to access this personal financial information to ensure security of transmission of the details over the Internet. It is a requirement of the financial service to ensure security.

In fact, I have learned that most such web sites use 128 bit encryption now. This was being denied to me and thus access to important financial information over the Internet. This argument and denial of activity made it explicitly clear what was going on in terms of the ability to stop my accessing any web page as they watched my activity. This has been done many, many times for the purposes of censorship to stop me reading articles and to stop and/or impede Email utilisation.

Finally, after many attempts over several weeks, I was able to download Internet Explorer version 6 from Yahoo which contained 128 bit encryption. This gave me access to the necessary financial accounts information on the Internet so I could keep track of my financial responsibilities. I needed to do this because on one occasion in January a posted bill for payment never arrived. I can keep track of all this activity and payment responsibilities on the Internet, but it took months to set it up due to the direct interference from those using the surveillance software. I could have solved this problem in a couple hours without the continuing interference.

The critically important software patches for security reasons from Microsoft are not available through its web site as noted. Thus, for months I was denied these just as I was denied Internet Explorer version 6 directly from Microsoft. I found an alternative at CNET in their facility called CatchUp which provides an analysis of the desktop software programmes and all the upgrades which are available. When I started using this, I again met with much direct interference which made it difficult for me to get the job done. I was finally allowed to work around the problem and had someone state "Let him have it" outside. From then on the downloads were OK on that evening. However, that cannot be depended upon to be the continuiug operational mode for the desktop computer system. I must anticipate continuous interference for that is what always happens. It is the standard.

There is no doubt that a considerable effort is made to stop each and every web site access which is deemed unacceptable by these two people carrying out the 24/7 surveillance "Fabrication" operation. These two people are "Harry" and the female member of the general public who was reported for her child abuse in early May 1998 among the four adults associated with the flat below mine. She is the mother of the two children who were being abused, and whose lives were at risk. She vowed revenge and retaliation publicly at that time and has been doing so ever since. She has been given access to the surveillance equipment which she has employed toward this end since 1998. She would shut down everything that I do if she could get away with it. Her objective is this destruction of my life and possession of the flat which she claims repeatedly as "my house".

The examples for this desktop system interference are multitude going on daily 24/7 for many, many months. Actually, it goes back to 1998 with its interference with the web cam to freeze its screen when they did not want me looking out my front window began. These were also noted by verbal confirmations. This interference is far from new. It has just escalated within the past 16 months to be totally invasive as to assume virtual control over the desktop and notebook computers from an external source by means of wireless communications to these computers in order to do so. This has been verified beyond any doubt by the actions and words used to describe all of this activity many, many times.

What has happened in the past 48 hours, I believe, has been first a responsible person stating the facts of law as regards to such interference as " . . . not in England". This is an assumption , but it is a reasonable one given what has occurred. However, secondly apparently in the absence of this one particular individual these two people revert to their total interference and disruptive behaviour attacking computer utilisation in whatever manner they choose. This is why I say that it is out of control. These two are engaged in this activity 24/7 and can manipulate the situation depending on the various people who might be present at different periods during the 24 hour day. This has always been true of the female since May 1998 and more recently since March of last year (2001) of "Harry".

This is a serious failure in management and control as regards to surveillance equipment utilisation because it permits these two who have malicious intent to dominate and control the activity carrying out whatever they want to do and denying it when I note it. If one person comes along and says "No" they accede for a short while then return to whatever it is they want to do to "Fabricate" the surveillance process by "shutting him down." This extends to all that they do 24/7 acress a wide range of activites impacting all that I do. I am just dealing with one aspect here. There is a failure to coordinate and control the surveillance activity by those in charge around-the-clock so that misuse and abuse of the surveillance equipment can take place as I have described.

This means that those who want to play people off one another and abuse the process can do so easily. This has been a point which I made years ago which was being carried out by this female in dealing with different departments of Government. It is true still in dealing with this one aspect of the activity: surveillance. The real failure is to allow two people such as these complete and total domination over the surveillance process. They should only be here eight hours a day at maximum. They should take two consecutive days off in every seven, and there should be manditory holiday periods of at least two weeks ever so often. In this activity that should be at least every six months.

Not only are they in a perfect position to dominate and control for criminal purposes, but they are also in a demented state of functioning as human beings from such continuous 24/7 activity. Their behaviour is often quite bizarre and emotionally out of control. The female has been sedated on one occasion as already noted early in the morning last year. Others have been shocked by her verbally violent behaviour. Are they living on amphetamines with that drug's effects impacting behaviour, or are there deeper personal problems here? Perhaps there is a combination of both. Surveillance equipment usage has no room for those who abuse drugs or have serious personal problems.

Furthermore, no member of the general public who is in a position of having reported anything about which the surveillance equipment is to be utilised should have any access to it whatsoever. This leaves the situation wide open for the kind of retaliation and abuse which has occurred in this instance over these past four plus years. It represents the grossest of mismanagement to have allowed this to happen at all for it has enabled perjury and the perversion of the course of justice to flourish.

Someone who has made the charge cannot then carry out the so-called evidence gathering process. In this instance what has resulted has been complete criminal vigilante activity with charges, judging, sentencing and punishment by arbitrary and capricious whim carried out by the use of surveillance equipment under the guise of an "investigation".

In what law enforcement activity has someone who makes a complaint been then allowed to accompany the police on their investigation and interview process to be present to bully and argue with all that is said in the interrogation and evidence collection process?

In what law enforcement process has someone been allowed to make a complaint without setting it down in writing attesting to its validity by signing it and then is allowed to participate fully in an investigation process to establish the "evidence" of this verbal complaint by fabricating it as the so-called investigation proceeds?

The nature of the totally invasive character of the current state-of-the -art surveillance equipment is such that its utilisation must be managed very, very carefully indeed. What this situation has explicitly shown is that the levels of management for utilising surveillance equipment are totally inadequate. This cannot be allowed to take place at low levels but must be managed at the highest levels. There must be tight management controls and explicit procedures put into place to ensure that it is never abused as it has been in this instance. There must be an entire re-think of the total process of surveillance and its role within a democratic society with regard to the laws themselves, law enforcement and existing due process procedures for the judicial review and implementation.

Obviously, all areas of surveillance management are totally inadequate and have failed miserably to protect society while preserving human and civil rights. The reverse has occurred with criminality established at the expense of society and the honest and decent. Overall, this is a real and present danger to borrow a familiar phrase.

The problems noted herein are just a few examples among hundreds constituting the intention and ability to censor correspondence and communication while depriving me of my ability to carry on my normal life as is necessary for me to meet responsibilities and obligations. These are gross violations of civil and criminal law. They are carried out with the intent to "Shut him down" in a process where management is "Out of control".

Gary D Chance
Wednesday, 3rd July 2002

Distribution:

"US Gov President George W Bush" <president@whitehouse.gov>
"UK Gov The Prime Minister Tony Blair"
<will someone please forward a copy of this to Mr Blair?>
"UK Gov HM Treasury Chancellor Gordon Brown"
<public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk>
"UK Gov Home Office Secretary David Blunkett"
<public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>,
"UK Gov DOH Secretary Alan Millburn"
<dhmail@doh.gsi.gov.uk>
"UK Gov DWP Secretary Andrew Smith"
<ministers@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>,
"UK Gov DTI&W Secretary Patricia Hewitt"
<dti.enquiries@dti.gsi.gov.uk>,
"UK Gov MP Karen Buck" <k.buck@rpkn-labour.freeuk.com>,
"St Mary's Chief Executive" <julian.nettel@st-marys.nhs.uk>
"St Charles Chief Executive" <richard.higgins@st-marys.nhs.uk>
"Western Eye Hospital General Manager"
<alison.mitchell-hall@st-marys.nhc.uk>
"Media BBC Today" <today@bbc.co.uk>,
"Media BBC PM" <pm@bbc.co.uk>,
"Media BBC World At One" <wato@bbc.co.uk>,
"Media BBC Broadcasting House" <bh@bbc.co.uk>
"Media Telegraph Crime" <crime@telegraph.co.uk>,
"Media Independent News Editor"
<newseditor@independent.co.uk>,
"Media Times Letters" <letters@the-times.co.uk>,
"Media Times Sunday Letters" <letters@sunday-times.co.uk>
"Media Guardian Letters" <letters@guardian.co.uk>,
"Media Evening Standard Letters" <letters@standard.co.uk>

II - Fabricating Mental Illness While Exploiting the Mentally Ill
Saturday, 6th July 2002

Mesdames et Messrs {See Distribution At End]

Total Effort to Shut Down: Part II: Fabricating Mental Illness While Exploiting the Mental Ill

I intend to send along four Emails under this title "Total Effort to Shut Down" with the following four parts:

I. Out of Control Management of Surveillance Activity
II. Fabricating Mental Illness While Exploiting the Mental Ill
III. Surreptitious Medication Without Consent or Knowledge
IV. Abuse of Environmental Health and Emergency Services

One of my key contentions is that there is a massive effort to fabricate mental illness against the background of the perceived need to stifle dissent rather than deal directly with critical analysis to effect meaningful change and effective management. This has been an ever escalating process over the past four years since May 1998. It has all been completely documented 24/7. In the past few days this has been explicitly noted by excellent examples reinforcing methodology and objective.

Yesterday as I accessed and read the following information at the noted web site:

The Pentagon's Secret Psychopharmalogical Warfare Program
http://www.counterpunch.org/hammond0702.html
http://www.sunshine-project.org

the reaction was "We have to get him out" meaning that I must be removed by force and violence from my home to stop me writing and communicating the truth about this situation. The primary false allegations used to effect this end are:

1. "He's psychotic"
2. "He's potty"
3. "He killed his mother"

These false allegations are made amid any number of other completely off the wall allegations that are as preposterous as they are absurd.

The above noted web sites reflect the research by means of the Freedom of Information Act by Edward Hammond who obtained a 49-page document from the US Department of Defense ("DoD") concerning the use of drugs to incapacitate people which explained or confirmed much of the purported surreptitious medication to which I am being subjected. His comments about it are well worth reading as this is the first revelation that the DoD has been developing this programme The DOD denied to former President Clinton that there were any involuntary or unwitting human subjects involved in "non-lethal" weapons and surveillance systems experimentation in a letter to Julianne McKinney dated 24th December 1994 where he stated explicitly:

"I have had the National Security Council staff look into your account of involuntary human experimentation by the Department of Defense with regard to "non-lethal" weapons and surveillance systems. They have reported back to me that there is no involvement of the Defense Department in involuntary human experimentation with regard to those systems. In fact, the Defense Department does not conduct any human testing on unwitting or involuntary subjects." (See
http://heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htm)

The CIA and the FBI are not part of the DoD, but some 85% of the US Intelligence community does report to the Secretary of Defense. The Pentagon's Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate ("JNLWD") has admitted that it now is "Drugging" unwitting or involuntary subjects which is directly relevant to my situation:

"The US has admitted that it forcibly sedates Al-Qaida "detainees" held at the US base in Guantanamo, Cuba. Former JNLWD commander and retired Col. Andy Mazzara, who directs the Penn State [JNLWD] team, says has he sent a "Science Advisor" to the US Navy to assist the War on Terrorism."

My point is that I am being held a "Prisoner" under "House arrest" which is claimed repeatedly by the two ex-US Marine US Government Agents "Colonel Vine" and "Lieutenant Harry X." These are their oft repeated words not mine but are consistent with all their activity. I am also being involuntarily subjected to "Drugging" as has been verbally noted and described as already described. The questions raised are (1) where does this come from; (2) how is it being done; and (3) why is this being conducted and carried out in London? The total activity has been described by "Lieutenant Harry X" as an "experiment." Finally, there are the issues of human and civil rights, direct US and UK legal restraints and those activities which are specifically forbidden by treaty.

An executive summary of this 49-page document can be found on Edward Hammond's web site www.sunshine-project.com as is noted above. Edward Hammond writes:

"At times, the JNLWD team's report [The Advantages and Limitations of Calmatives for Use as a Non-Lethal Technique] veers very close to defining dissent as a psychological disorder."

The above statement would be true of a significant portion of those in the career military establishment who have no tolerance for any other view. This comes from surrendering the self totally to military commands as military training demands and creates in order to face battlefield death. A deep resentment develops against anyone who might dare think for themselves, ask questions and provide a critical analysis. The process of military training is fundamentally one of dehumanisation destroying the individual and creating a machine capable of walking into battle. This machine then dehumanises and seeks to destroy others who do not agree. It results in the necessity to create an enemy while thinking that this enemy is less than human or abnormal resulting in the use of such words as "Psychotic" and/or "Potty" in a vaguely non-specific, generalised manner which carries only the emotive meaning of bigotry.

The use of such drugs as those being used against me by explicit statements are noted by Edward Hammond as:

"Calmatives [which] were supposed to have been deleted from military stockpiles following the adoption of the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1993, which bans any chemical weapon that can cause death, temporary incapacitation, or permanent harm to humans or animals."

Maybe this explains why this is taking place in London. He goes on:

"Calmative is military, not medical, terminology. In more familiar medical language, most of the drugs under consideration are central nervous system depressants. Most are synthetic, some are natural. They include opiates (morphine-type drugs) and benzodiazpines, such as Valium (diazepam). Antidepressants are also of great interest to the research team, which is looking for drugs like Prozac (fluoxetine) and Zoloft (sertraline) that are faster acting.

"Biochemicals and Treaties: Many of the proposed drugs can be considered both chemical and biological weapons banned by the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). As a practical matter, biological and chemical "calmatives" must be addressed together. As the agents are explicitly intended for military use, and are intended to incapacitate their victims, they do not fall under the CWC's domestic riot control agent exemption. Toxic products of living agents - such as the neurotoxin botulinum - are considered both chemical and biological agents. Any weapons use of neurotransmitters or substances mimicking their action is similarly covered by both arms control treaties. The researchers have developed a massive calmatives database and are following biomedical research on mechanisms of drug addiction, pain relief, and other areas of research on cognition-altering biochemicals. For example, the JNLWD team is tracking research on cholecystokinin, a neurotransmitter that causes panic attacks in healthy people and is linked to psychiatric disorders.

"Torture: Precedex is sedative approved for use in the US on patients hospitalized in intensive care units. The report draws attention to an "interesting phenomenon" related to Precedex use - the drug increases patients' reaction to electrical shock. The researchers suggest sensitizing people by using Precedex on them, followed by use of electromagnetic weapons to "address effects on the few individuals where an average dose of the pharmacological agent did not have the desired effect." Obviously, such a technique might be considered torture, and certainly could be used to torture. To add to hypnotic and delusional properties, the researchers suggest that psychopharmaceutical agents could be designed to have physical effects including headache and nausea, adding to their torture potential."

In the early morning about 0200 on Tuesday, 26th February 2002, following more vomiting and a "cracked rib" pain induced earlier in the evening for a couple hours, a male drove down the road from the end of the building outside my front window to where "Lt Harry X" was carrying out his campaign assisted by the female member of the general public and explicitly told him "That's torture" thereby getting him to cease, at least for the moment, his activity. This was the end of the "Poisoning" episode which commenced on Sunday evening, 24th February 2002, and has been communicated in full by Email to this distribution list a couple days later referring to this incident. A copy of this Email has been published on my website: http://garydchance.tripod.com/surveillance

The reaction against me yesterday was explicitly noted as an effort to suppress and deny me free access to information while keying on the content of what was disclosed as the reason to attack me by other, trumped up means to effect my destruction through attempting to get someone in a UK law enforcement capacity to carry out criminal vigilante actions to remove me by force and violence from my home. Destruction is the objective of these people not law enforcement. Their allegations are all fabricated, and they have no explicit legal process to follow. They just want to get me out. What follows? Will that then be the "kidnap" and "kill" stage the other threats they have verbalised against me?

The key people yesterday urging this when seeing what I was reading were the two ex-US Marine US Government Agents Colonel Vine and "Lt Harry X" along with their recruited general member of the public, a non-resident who is the mother of the two children abused in the flat below. She was among the four adults involved in this child abuse that I reported in early May 1998. It is extremely important to note that these are ex-US military personnel who are completely involved and the driving force behind the false allegations. Their reaction to such an article appearing about psychoactive drug implementation by the US DoD most likely reflects their concern to stop the confirmation that such activities are being carried out in the UK as an experiment against me.

I want to point out that the objective has nothing to do with specific complaints of behaviour against me except for trumped up false allegations with an attempt to address any legitimate complaint. There are none. Instead, there are general statements which are meaningless and irrelevant to any objective most especially the stated one to "Get/pull/take him out." To yell "He's psychotic/potty! Get him out!" are meaningless generalities used to apparently justify an illegal eviction. There is no warrant, and there has been no crime committed, yet this has been going on for years with escalations as noted. What this amounts to is criminal harassment in direct violation of Section 3 of the Protection From Harassment Act of 1997 to say nothing about human rights violations among a multitude of other unlawful and criminal acts.

The false allegation "He killed his mother" is being used as a fear mongering statement in this vigilante context. Is is not being processed through the legal justice system or properly by law enforcement. Instead, it is being used by these vigilantes as a prime justification to take the law into their own hands in order to commit any number of crimes with complete disregard of the law.

There is nothing new about this. These tactics have been well developed and used extensively by the US FBI in their Counter Intelligence Programme (COINTELPRO) which has been extensively documented at:

http://www.derechos.net/paulwolf/cointelpropapers/coinwcar3.htm

I have been so impressed by the summary of its techniques as described which relate closely to my experience as a victim of this surveillance driven stalking and harassment against me that I want to quote the following since it is critically important and ends with the fact that false allegations are freely used by law enforcement including murder against those whom the want to deny free expression:

"COINTELPRO Techniques

"From its inception, the FBI has operated on the doctrine that the "preliminary stages of organization and preparation" must be frustrated, well before there is any clear and present danger of "revolutionary radicalism."

"At its most extreme dimension, political dissidents have been eliminated outright or sent to prison for the rest of their lives. There are quite a number of individuals who have been handled in that fashion.

"Many more, however, were "neutralized" by intimidation, harassment, discrediting, snitch jacketing, a whole assortment of authoritarian and illegal tactics.

"Neutralization, as explained on record by the FBI, doesn't necessarily pertain to the apprehension of parties in the commission of a crime, the preparation of evidence against them, and securing of a judicial conviction, but rather to simply making them incapable of engaging in political activity by whatever means.

"For those not assessed as being in themselves, necessarily a security risk, but engaged in what the Bureau views to be politically objectionable activity, those techniques might consist of disseminating derogatory information to the target's family, friends and associates, visiting and questioning them, basically, making it clear that the FBI are paying attention to them, to try to intimidate them.

"If the subject continues their activities, and particularly if they respond by escalating them, the FBI will escalate its tactics as well. Maybe they'll be arrested and prosecuted for spurious reasons. Maybe there will be more vicious rumors circulated about them. False information may be planted in the press. The targets' efforts to speak in public are frustrated, employers may be contacted to try to get them fired. Anonymous letters have been sent by the FBI to targets' spouses, accusing them of infidelity. Others have contained death threats.

"And if the subject persists then there will be a further escalation.

"According to FBI memoranda of the 1960s, "Key black activists" were repeatedly arrested "on any excuse" until "they could no longer make bail." The FBI made use of informants, often quite violent and emotionally disturbed individuals, to present false testimony to the courts, to frame COINTELPRO targets for crimes they knew they did not commit. In some cases the charges were quite serious, including murder."

Evidently these tactics are alive and well being carried out by two ex-US Marine US Government Agents, Colonel Vine and "Lt Harry X" as well as others in North Kensington. This activity goes on minute-by-minute, 24/7 and has been so conducted for years.

1. Chronic sleep deprivation externally induced from:
a. Stalking and harassment from the public road under my window all night long
b. Yelling from the flat below in the middle of the night
c. Two sometimes three dogs barking on balcony below the front window day and night
d. Door slamming from below day and night
e. Foot stomping on floor above
f. Foot stomping/hits from below

2. Surreptitious medication administration by means of:
a. Re-routed cold water intake from another tank located in flat below
b. Molecular sized vaporisation
c. Electro magnetic radiation in frequency range 1 to 10 Hz to produce drowsiness
d. Electro magnetic radiation in brainwave frequency range (less than 1,000 Hz) to simulate impact of medication, e.g., impacting neurons or neurotransmitters controlling muscles

3. Constant harassment minute-by-minute by means of:
a. Verbal personal attacks claiming falsely "He's potty"; "He's psychotic"; and He's really sick";
b. Verbally claiming continuously "He's drugged"
c. False allegations such as "He killed his mother" and any number of any other atrociously false allegation including allegations of constant sexual activity all of which do not exist
d. Criminal vigilante incitements to "Take/Get/Pull him out" of his home by force and violence made to emergency services every few hours (sometimes continuously) based upon the false allegations noted in a, b and c above where c is used as an enticement because of alleged physical powerlessness to enable such forced removal to occur easily
e. All of these verbally generated personal attacks, false allegations and vigilante incitements above are intended to induce fear causing disruption, disturbance and destruction of whatever I am doing whether it is using the computer systems, preparing food in the kitchen, eating, using the bathroom in any capacity, sleeping or trying to do and whatever else I do including simply walking
f. Utilisation of totally invasive surveillance technological equipment tracking relentlessly every instant of all my activity in order to verbally attack the most miniscule action constantly in an effort to build up resentment to provoke a response which can itself then be attacked or used against me

All these activities are intended to impact me negatively as much as possible reinforcing each other to create a false image and/or perception of what I am. These are used so frequently (in machine gun-like blasts of firing often times) that they are also intended to replace any independent observation and assessment by others in the hopes that the bullying, yelling and roaring emotionally verbal delivery from these people will be taken as valid with no further consideration. This involves fear mongering to create mass hysteria in a crowd while constantly making every effort to preclude the possibility that anything else will not be seriously considered. Any number of people are permitted to witness and use the surveillance equipment but are told what actions and behaviour means by repeating false allegations leading to further incitement.

This is why two of these ("Harry" and his recruited female member of the general public) spend 24/7 in my vicinity wherever I am to make certain that they can keep stalking and harassing hoping to provoke a response to confirm their false allegations. It has never happenrf in years.

The essence of their activity is to create debility by all three (1, 2 and 3 above) carried out relentlessly without any let up at all. This mixture is quite lethal and physiologically ultimately destructive. That debility is then referred to as "Potty" and/or "Psychotic" except for the fact that there is no debility except that induced by chronic sleep deprivation (chronic fatigue and exhaustion), drugging (reinforcing the chronic fatigue and exhaustion with depressants) and the continuous verbal abuse (in and of itself a distraction, disruption and disturbance).

All actions which are noted as being such are meaningless, insignificant and trivial, yet these two make every effort to once again obscure (hopefully) any independent observation and verification. They continuously misrepresent, distort and exaggerate in the hopes of fabricating a totally false image. They are trying to ascribe to me what they are creating, or trying to create, themselves in me from the impact of their own behaviour. None of it works. There is nothing that comes from within which would justify any of the allegations. They are all false and externally generated. They are like schoolyard bullies beating an animal with sticks who then point at the animal as the source of the problem.

What happens always is that those who are called in to respond to these false allegations and vigilante incitements depart with negative comments to the effect "I can't do that" meaning "Take him out" of his home. Recent statements about my activity from others called in have been noted as no conclusion can be made out of the activity noted such as preparing lunch. So far at least there have been people who have looked for themselves and used their own minds, but the fact that this continues indicates that not all do so.

It is not uncommon to use mental or emotional illness as a weapon for them to hide behind smoke screening their own criminal behaviour while trying to discredit anything I say by the infantile name calling for that is precisely what it is. It has been my conclusion based on all the behaviour which I have witnessed for over six years now that there is serious mental and emotional illness which is being projected on me. This was obvious from the child abuse and results from that being passed from generation to generation. The obsession with destroying sexual activity most likely comes from an unconscious repressed trauma from very early childhood. All of the detail supports that conclusion, and I have concluded that there is serious mental illness and extreme emotional disturbance as well as mental retardation present in those who are attacking me falsely and knowingly so.

The surveillance equipment in all of its stages of growing use and in its most sophisticated level involving total invasion of the human being's body and activity make this kind of abuse possible and capable of denying independent observation and evaluation when it is totally under the domination and control of these two people 24/7. What I believe, however, is that "Lt Harry X" and Colonel Vine are deliberately exploiting the mental illness, emotional disturbance and mental retardation of the female general member of the public in order to achieve their own corrupt self-interest objectives: greed, glory and power. Once again all of the details including constant false flattery repeated in situations that are clearly disastrous support the fact that this exploitation of the most despicable kind is going on. To obtain from a seriously disturbed person the result of acting out the disturbance only results in the ultimate destruction of that person. This has been occurring slowly as I observe the behaviour of those acting against me. The behaviour they exhibit is not that which a normal person would manifest. Such exploitation of the mentally ill is consistent with long tried dirty tricks which were noted in the outline of COINTELPRO activity described above.

I have arrived at my conclusions by careful observation and extensive note taking. It is all based on significant and meaningful facts noted from behaviour. In this case the female member of the general public has also been promised possession of this flat as a reward which she notes herself continuously as "My house." She was originally motivated by revenge for my having reported her child abuse to protect the children and by an unconsciously repressed motivation behind her murderous rage. That has now been augmented by the prospect of gaining this flat for her own. Thus, she will do anything to achieve these two goals: a phoney psychological reward and material gain. For her it is a corrupt self-interest now as well.

None of this is a secret and none of this is unusual. It is how the infantile humans who have never matured seek reward without honest achievement. There is far too much detail to support these conclusions. They are the reality of the situation despite all that is done to hide them by all of the activity described above.

This is truly a hoax and ignominious exploitation of monstrous proportions carried out by those using lethal weapons under the apparently now acceptable guise of researching and developing non-lethal weapons. However, in this case it is done against someone who is totally innocent while violating all societies' and nation states' efforts to control and prevent this most inhumane of activities. The process of abusing power for his own corrupt self-interest never stops. That is why this must be brought to light and made public for the whole world to understand exactly what it is happening.

Gary D Chance
Saturday, 6th July 2002

Distribution:

"US Gov President George W Bush" <president@whitehouse.gov>
"UK Gov The Prime Minister Tony Blair"
<will someone please forward a copy of this to Mr Blair?>
"UK Gov HM Treasury Chancellor Gordon Brown"
<public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk>
"UK Gov Home Office Secretary David Blunkett"
<public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>,
"UK Gov DOH Secretary Alan Millburn"
<dhmail@doh.gsi.gov.uk>
"UK Gov DWP Secretary Andrew Smith"
<ministers@dwp.gsi.gov.uk>,
"UK Gov DTI&W Secretary Patricia Hewitt"
<dti.enquiries@dti.gsi.gov.uk>,
"UK Gov MP Karen Buck" <k.buck@rpkn-labour.freeuk.com>,
"St Mary's Chief Executive" <julian.nettel@st-marys.nhs.uk>
"St Charles Chief Executive" <richard.higgins@st-marys.nhs.uk>
"Western Eye Hospital General Manager"
<alison.mitchell-hall@st-marys.nhc.uk>
"Media BBC Today" <today@bbc.co.uk>,
"Media BBC PM" <pm@bbc.co.uk>,
"Media BBC World At One" <wato@bbc.co.uk>,
"Media BBC Broadcasting House" <bh@bbc.co.uk>
"Media Telegraph Crime" <crime@telegraph.co.uk>,
"Media Independent News Editor"
<newseditor@independent.co.uk>,
"Media Times Letters" <letters@the-times.co.uk>,
"Media Times Sunday Letters" <letters@sunday-times.co.uk>
"Media Guardian Letters" <letters@guardian.co.uk>,
"Media Evening Standard Letters" <letters@standard.co.uk>

Copyright 1996 - 2004 by Gary D Chance

All rights reserved

Permission to reproduce and distribute electronic copies free of charge is hereby granted provided that it is reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users, but a printed copy or copies or a copy or copies distributed for financial gain is forbidden.